ATI Radeon 9100 vs Quadro M3000 SE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1574
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.03
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGM204R200
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2 October 2016 (9 years ago)1 April 2003 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed540 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate34.562.000
Floating-point processing power1.106 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs648
L1 Cache384 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
WidthMXM Module1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.4 GB/s8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 October 2016 1 April 2003
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 28 Watt

M3000 SE has an age advantage of 13 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9100, on the other hand, has 168% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro M3000 SE and Radeon 9100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro M3000 SE is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 9100 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Quadro M3000 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate Radeon 9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M3000 SE or Radeon 9100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.