M2200 vs P3000 Mobile

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

P3000 Mobile
19.20
+73.8%

P3000 Mobile outperforms M2200 by 74% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking269388
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money9.961.06
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code nameN17E-Q1N17P-Q3
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date11 January 2017 (7 years old)13 January 2017 (7 years old)
Current price$537 $1967
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

P3000 Mobile has 840% better value for money than Quadro M2200.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801024
Core clock speed1088 MHz694 MHz
Boost clock speed1215 MHz1038 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million1870 Million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate97.2066.30
Floating-point performance3,110 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro P3000 Mobile and Quadro M2200 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHz5508 MHz
Memory bandwidth168 GB/s88 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.41.2

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus++
3D Stereo++
Mosaic++
nView Display Management++
Optimus++

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA6.15.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P3000 Mobile 19.20
+73.8%
Quadro M2200 11.05

P3000 Mobile outperforms M2200 by 74% in our combined benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

P3000 Mobile 33390
+35.6%
Quadro M2200 24622

P3000 Mobile outperforms M2200 by 36% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

P3000 Mobile 12105
+64.2%
Quadro M2200 7372

P3000 Mobile outperforms M2200 by 64% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

P3000 Mobile 9256
+58.2%
Quadro M2200 5850

P3000 Mobile outperforms M2200 by 58% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

P3000 Mobile 63332
+67.6%
Quadro M2200 37796

P3000 Mobile outperforms M2200 by 68% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

P3000 Mobile 331998
+14.8%
Quadro M2200 289176

P3000 Mobile outperforms M2200 by 15% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

P3000 Mobile 68
+44.3%
Quadro M2200 47

P3000 Mobile outperforms M2200 by 44% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 3%

P3000 Mobile 107
+24.5%
Quadro M2200 86

P3000 Mobile outperforms M2200 by 24% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 3%

P3000 Mobile 73
+26.2%
Quadro M2200 58

P3000 Mobile outperforms M2200 by 26% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

P3000 Mobile 97
+34%
Quadro M2200 72

P3000 Mobile outperforms M2200 by 34% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

P3000 Mobile 87
+27%
Quadro M2200 69

P3000 Mobile outperforms M2200 by 27% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

P3000 Mobile 30
+21.1%
Quadro M2200 25

P3000 Mobile outperforms M2200 by 21% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

P3000 Mobile 55
+67.1%
Quadro M2200 33

P3000 Mobile outperforms M2200 by 67% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

P3000 Mobile 8
+48.1%
Quadro M2200 5

P3000 Mobile outperforms M2200 by 48% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Benchmark coverage: 2%

P3000 Mobile 55
+67.1%
Quadro M2200 33

P3000 Mobile outperforms M2200 by 67% in SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase.

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

Benchmark coverage: 2%

P3000 Mobile 68
+44.3%
Quadro M2200 47

P3000 Mobile outperforms M2200 by 44% in SPECviewperf 12 - Maya.

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Benchmark coverage: 2%

P3000 Mobile 97
+34%
Quadro M2200 72

P3000 Mobile outperforms M2200 by 34% in SPECviewperf 12 - Catia.

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

Benchmark coverage: 2%

P3000 Mobile 107
+24.5%
Quadro M2200 86

P3000 Mobile outperforms M2200 by 24% in SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks.

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

Benchmark coverage: 2%

P3000 Mobile 73
+26.2%
Quadro M2200 58

P3000 Mobile outperforms M2200 by 26% in SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX.

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

Benchmark coverage: 2%

P3000 Mobile 87
+27%
Quadro M2200 69

P3000 Mobile outperforms M2200 by 27% in SPECviewperf 12 - Creo.

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

Benchmark coverage: 2%

P3000 Mobile 30
+21.1%
Quadro M2200 25

P3000 Mobile outperforms M2200 by 21% in SPECviewperf 12 - Medical.

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

Benchmark coverage: 2%

P3000 Mobile 7.7
+48.1%
Quadro M2200 5.2

P3000 Mobile outperforms M2200 by 48% in SPECviewperf 12 - Energy.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD64
+42.2%
45
−42.2%
4K28
+100%
14
−100%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+76.5%
16−18
−76.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+69.6%
21−24
−69.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+94.1%
16−18
−94.1%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+71.1%
35−40
−71.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+72.4%
27−30
−72.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+76.5%
16−18
−76.5%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+82.1%
27−30
−82.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+73.3%
30−33
−73.3%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+69.2%
35−40
−69.2%
Hitman 3 55−60
+89.7%
27−30
−89.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+78.3%
21−24
−78.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+68.4%
18−20
−68.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+78.3%
21−24
−78.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+85%
20−22
−85%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+69.6%
21−24
−69.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+94.1%
16−18
−94.1%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+71.1%
35−40
−71.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+72.4%
27−30
−72.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+76.5%
16−18
−76.5%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+82.1%
27−30
−82.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+73.3%
30−33
−73.3%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+69.2%
35−40
−69.2%
Hitman 3 55−60
+89.7%
27−30
−89.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+78.3%
21−24
−78.3%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+82.4%
16−18
−82.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+68.4%
18−20
−68.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+78.3%
21−24
−78.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
+70.3%
37
−70.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+85%
20−22
−85%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+69.6%
21−24
−69.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+94.1%
16−18
−94.1%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+71.1%
35−40
−71.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+76.5%
16−18
−76.5%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+82.1%
27−30
−82.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+73.3%
30−33
−73.3%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+69.2%
35−40
−69.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+65%
20
−65%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+85%
20−22
−85%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+81.3%
16−18
−81.3%
Hitman 3 30−35
+82.4%
16−18
−82.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+52.9%
16−18
−52.9%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+100%
9−10
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+81.8%
10−12
−81.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+110%
20−22
−110%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+94.7%
18−20
−94.7%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+95%
20−22
−95%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+90.9%
10−12
−90.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Hitman 3 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+69.2%
13
−69.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+72.7%
10−12
−72.7%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%

This is how P3000 Mobile and Quadro M2200 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • P3000 Mobile is 42.2% faster than Quadro M2200

4K resolution:

  • P3000 Mobile is 100% faster than Quadro M2200

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the P3000 Mobile is 300% faster than the Quadro M2200.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, P3000 Mobile surpassed Quadro M2200 in all 68 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 19.20 11.05
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 55 Watt

The Quadro P3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile
Quadro P3000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Quadro M2200

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 123 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 264 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro M2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.