Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M vs Quadro M2200

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking390not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.03no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Gen. 4.5 (2008)
GPU code nameN17P-Q3GL40
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date13 January 2017 (7 years ago)1 October 2008 (15 years ago)
Current price$1967 $77

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102410
Core clock speed694 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHzno data
Number of transistors1870 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Wattno data
Texture fill rate66.30no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M2200 and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed5508 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth88 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1210
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126no data
CUDA5.2no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 January 2017 1 October 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm

We couldn't decide between Quadro M2200 and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro M2200 is a mobile workstation card while Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Quadro M2200
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 282 votes

Rate Quadro M2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 162 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.