Quadro M2000M vs GeForce GTX 675M SLI

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

GTX 675M SLI
8.74

Quadro M2000M outperforms GeForce GTX 675M SLI by 2% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking455449
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money2.242.31
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code nameN12E-GTX2GM107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date6 January 2011 (13 years old)2 October 2015 (8 years old)
Current price$499 $363
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

M2000M has 3% better value for money than GTX 675M SLI.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768640
Core clock speed620 MHz1038 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1197 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2x 100 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rateno data43.92
Floating-point performanceno data1,405 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 675M SLI and Quadro M2000M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
Interfaceno dataMXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed3000 MHz5000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Display Portno data1.2

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus++
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkanno data+
CUDA+5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 675M SLI 8.74
M2000M 8.93
+2.2%

Quadro M2000M outperforms GeForce GTX 675M SLI by 2% in our combined benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 675M SLI 18405
M2000M 20567
+11.7%

Quadro M2000M outperforms GeForce GTX 675M SLI by 12% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 675M SLI 6407
+24.6%
M2000M 5143

GeForce GTX 675M SLI outperforms Quadro M2000M by 25% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−2.9%
36
+2.9%
4K10−12
−10%
11
+10%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−4.8%
21−24
+4.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hitman 3 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−4.8%
21−24
+4.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hitman 3 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−27.8%
23
+27.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−4.8%
21−24
+4.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+28.6%
14
−28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hitman 3 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hitman 3 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−50%
9
+50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how GTX 675M SLI and M2000M compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • M2000M is 2.9% faster than GTX 675M SLI

4K resolution:

  • M2000M is 10% faster than GTX 675M SLI

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 675M SLI is 28.6% faster than the M2000M.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the M2000M is 50% faster than the GTX 675M SLI.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 675M SLI is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • M2000M is ahead in 17 tests (25%)
  • there's a draw in 50 tests (74%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 8.74 8.93
Recency 6 January 2011 2 October 2015
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 55 Watt

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 675M SLI and Quadro M2000M. The differences in performance seem too small.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 675M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Quadro M2000M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M SLI
GeForce GTX 675M SLI
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Quadro M2000M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 4 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 438 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro M2000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.