ATI Radeon 7200 vs Quadro K620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6631596
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.10no data
Power efficiency9.02no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameGM107R100
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 July 2014 (11 years ago)1 April 2000 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$189.89 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed1058 MHz166 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)41 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate26.981
Floating-point processing power0.8632 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs246
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Length160 mmno data
Width1" (2.5 cm)1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type128 BitDDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 29 GB/s5.312 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort1x VGA
Number of simultaneous displays4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX127.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.51.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.0-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K620 2210
+110400%
Samples: 2613
ATI 7200 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 July 2014 1 April 2000
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 41 Watt 23 Watt

Quadro K620 has an age advantage of 14 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 7200, on the other hand, has 78.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K620 and Radeon 7200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K620 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 7200 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K620
Quadro K620
ATI Radeon 7200
Radeon 7200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 771 votes

Rate Quadro K620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 24 votes

Rate Radeon 7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K620 or Radeon 7200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.