FirePro V5900 vs Quadro K620

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Quadro K620
2014
2GB 128-bit
5.77
+77%

Quadro K620 outperforms FirePro V5900 by 77% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking560701
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation1.211.15
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameGM107Cayman
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date22 July 2014 (9 years ago)24 May 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$189.89 no data
Current price$286 (1.5x MSRP)$89

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro K620 has 5% better value for money than FirePro V5900.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384512
Core clock speed1058 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million2,640 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)41 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate26.9819.20
Floating-point performance863.2 gflops614.4 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length160 mm230 mm
Width1" (2.5 cm)1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type128 BitGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 29 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDVI-I DP1x DVI
Number of simultaneous displays4no data

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1211.2 (11_0)
Shader Model55.0
OpenGL4.54.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA5.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K620 5.77
+77%
FirePro V5900 3.26

Quadro K620 outperforms FirePro V5900 by 77% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro K620 2233
+76.8%
FirePro V5900 1263

Quadro K620 outperforms FirePro V5900 by 77% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 5.77 3.26
Recency 22 July 2014 24 May 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 41 Watt 75 Watt

The Quadro K620 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro V5900 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K620
Quadro K620
AMD FirePro V5900
FirePro V5900

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 551 vote

Rate Quadro K620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 47 votes

Rate FirePro V5900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.