FirePro V4900 vs Quadro K620

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Quadro K620
2014
2GB 128-bit
5.77
+126%

Quadro K620 outperforms FirePro V4900 by 126% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking560785
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation1.210.38
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGM107Turks
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date22 July 2014 (9 years ago)1 November 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$189.89 no data
Current price$286 (1.5x MSRP)$155

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro K620 has 218% better value for money than FirePro V4900.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384480
Core clock speed1058 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)41 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate26.9819.20
Floating-point performance863.2 gflops768.0 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length160 mm163 mm
Width1" (2.5 cm)1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

Memory type128 BitGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz4000 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 29 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDVI-I DP1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displays4no data

Supported Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1211.2 (11_0)
Shader Model55.0
OpenGL4.54.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA5.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K620 5.77
+126%
FirePro V4900 2.55

Quadro K620 outperforms FirePro V4900 by 126% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro K620 2233
+126%
FirePro V4900 987

Quadro K620 outperforms FirePro V4900 by 126% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 5.77 2.55
Recency 22 July 2014 1 November 2011
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 41 Watt 75 Watt

The Quadro K620 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro V4900 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K620
Quadro K620
AMD FirePro V4900
FirePro V4900

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 552 votes

Rate Quadro K620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 129 votes

Rate FirePro V4900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.