Quadro P3000 Mobile vs K6000

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Quadro K6000
2013
12 GB GDDR5
20.81
+8.4%

K6000 outperforms P3000 Mobile by 8% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking244270
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money11.179.87
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGK110BN17E-Q1
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date23 July 2013 (10 years old)11 January 2017 (7 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,265 no data
Current price$429 (0.1x MSRP)$537

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro K6000 has 13% better value for money than P3000 Mobile.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28801280
Core clock speed797 MHz1088 MHz
Boost clock speed902 MHz1215 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate216.597.20
Floating-point performance5,196 gflops3,110 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro K6000 and Quadro P3000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed6008 MHz7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s168 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs
Display Portno data1.4

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimusno data+
3D Stereono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA3.56.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD65−70
+1.6%
64
−1.6%
4K30−35
+7.1%
28
−7.1%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 20.81 19.20
Recency 23 July 2013 11 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 75 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro K6000 and Quadro P3000 Mobile.

Be aware that Quadro K6000 is a workstation card while Quadro P3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K6000
Quadro K6000
NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile
Quadro P3000 Mobile

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 99 votes

Rate Quadro K6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 127 votes

Rate Quadro P3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.