Tesla C1080 vs Quadro K600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking975not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.11no data
Power efficiency3.23no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGK107GT200B
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 March 2013 (12 years ago)9 April 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192240
Core clock speed876 MHz610 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)41 Watt188 Watt
Texture fill rate14.0248.80
Floating-point processing power0.3364 TFLOPS0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs1680
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length160 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/s102.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA3.01.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2013 9 April 2009
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 41 Watt 188 Watt

Quadro K600 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 358.5% lower power consumption.

Tesla C1080, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K600 and Tesla C1080. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K600
Quadro K600
NVIDIA Tesla C1080
Tesla C1080

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 213 votes

Rate Quadro K600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla C1080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K600 or Tesla C1080, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.