Mobility Radeon 9000 vs Quadro K600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking866not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.15no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGK107M9
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 March 2013 (11 years ago)1 September 2002 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data
Current price$220 (1.1x MSRP)$17.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1925
Core clock speed876 MHz1 MHz
Boost clock speedno data240 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)41 Wattno data
Texture fill rate14.020.96
Floating-point performance336.4 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro K600 and Mobility Radeon 9000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Length160 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1782 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/s3.2 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA3.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2013 1 September 2002
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

We couldn't decide between Quadro K600 and Mobility Radeon 9000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K600 is a workstation card while Mobility Radeon 9000 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K600
Quadro K600
ATI Mobility Radeon 9000
Mobility Radeon 9000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 190 votes

Rate Quadro K600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon 9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.