GRID K500 vs Quadro K600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking977not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.11no data
Power efficiency3.24no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGK107GK104
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 March 2013 (12 years ago)2 July 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $3,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1921536 ×2
Core clock speed876 MHz745 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)41 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate14.0295.36 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.3364 TFLOPS2.289 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs1632 ×2
TMUs16128 ×2
L1 Cache16 KB128 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length160 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB ×2
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed891 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/s160.0 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.1.126
CUDA3.03.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2013 2 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 41 Watt 225 Watt

Quadro K600 has 448.8% lower power consumption.

GRID K500, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K600 and GRID K500. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K600
Quadro K600
NVIDIA GRID K500
GRID K500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 214 votes

Rate Quadro K600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K600 or GRID K500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.