ATI Radeon 9250 vs Quadro K5100M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5631609
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.17no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGK104RV280
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date23 July 2013 (12 years ago)1 March 2004 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed771 MHz240 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate98.690.96
Floating-point processing power2.369 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs1284
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/s3.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX128.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.51.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

K5100M 3340
+166900%
Samples: 183
ATI 9250 2
Samples: 123

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD51no data
4K26no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 14−16 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Counter-Strike 2 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Fortnite 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 5 24−27 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 no data
Valorant 80−85 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Counter-Strike 2 40−45 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Dota 2 60−65 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Fortnite 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 5 24−27 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33 no data
Metro Exodus 16−18 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25 no data
Valorant 80−85 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Dota 2 60−65 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14 no data
Valorant 80−85 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 45−50 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 10−11 no data
Metro Exodus 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 no data
Valorant 90−95 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 no data
Far Cry 5 16−18 no data
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 16−18 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20 no data
Metro Exodus 3−4 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10 no data
Valorant 40−45 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10 no data
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 30−33 no data
Far Cry 5 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 8−9 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 July 2013 1 March 2004
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

K5100M has an age advantage of 9 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K5100M and Radeon 9250. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K5100M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon 9250 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 64 votes

Rate Quadro K5100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 56 votes

Rate Radeon 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K5100M or Radeon 9250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.