Arc 7 A770M vs Quadro K500M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1032not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.45no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGK107DG2-512
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 June 2012 (12 years ago)2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1924096
Core clock speed850 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate13.60422.4
Floating-point processing power0.3264 TFLOPS13.52 TFLOPS
ROPs8128
TMUs16256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz12 GB/s
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 120 Watt

Quadro K500M has 242.9% lower power consumption.

Arc 7 A770M, on the other hand, has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K500M and Arc 7 A770M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K500M is a mobile workstation card while Arc 7 A770M is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K500M
Quadro K500M
Intel Arc 7 A770M
Arc 7 A770M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro K500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 48 votes

Rate Arc 7 A770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.