ATI Radeon 9200 PRO vs Quadro K5000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6071602
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.02no data
Power efficiency5.17no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGK104RV280
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date7 August 2012 (13 years ago)1 May 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1344no data
Core clock speed601 MHz239 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate67.310.96
Floating-point processing power1.615 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs1124
L1 Cache112 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed750 MHz164 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s5.248 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

K5000M 2804
+140100%
Samples: 114
ATI 9200 PRO 2
Samples: 41

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD59no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.59no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 12−14 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 27−30 no data
Counter-Strike 2 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Fortnite 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 5 20−22 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27 no data
Valorant 70−75 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 27−30 no data
Counter-Strike 2 30−35 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Dota 2 50−55 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Fortnite 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 5 20−22 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27 no data
Metro Exodus 12−14 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20 no data
Valorant 70−75 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Dota 2 50−55 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20 no data
Valorant 70−75 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 40−45 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8 no data
Metro Exodus 6−7 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 no data
Valorant 75−80 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 14−16 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 no data
Metro Exodus 2−3 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
Valorant 30−35 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7 no data
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 24−27 no data
Far Cry 5 6−7 no data
Forza Horizon 4 10−12 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 7−8 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 August 2012 1 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 28 Watt

K5000M has an age advantage of 9 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 PRO, on the other hand, has 257% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K5000M and Radeon 9200 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K5000M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon 9200 PRO is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 87 votes

Rate Quadro K5000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 8 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K5000M or Radeon 9200 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.