ATI 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI vs Quadro K5000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking540not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.16no data
Power efficiency5.02no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)no data
GPU code nameGK104Rage Pro Turbo
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date7 August 2012 (12 years ago)1 March 1997 (27 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1344no data
Core clock speed601 MHz75 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate67.310.08
Floating-point processing power1.615 TFLOPSno data
ROPs321
TMUs1121

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCI
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed750 MHz75 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s600 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DB13W3

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)6.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.1
OpenCL1.2None
Vulkan+-
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 August 2012 1 March 1997
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 350 nm

K5000M has an age advantage of 15 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K5000M and 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K5000M is a mobile workstation card while 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
Quadro K5000M
ATI 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI
3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 85 votes

Rate Quadro K5000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.