Radeon RX Vega M vs Quadro K5000 SYNC

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated377
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data80.44
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGK104Vega
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 January 2013 (13 years ago)1 February 2018 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,299 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536512
Core clock speed706 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1190 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million4,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)122 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate90.3738.08
Floating-point processing power2.169 TFLOPSno data
ROPs328
TMUs12832
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width3-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1350 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth172.8 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x SDIno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12.0
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 January 2013 1 February 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 122 Watt 15 Watt

RX Vega M has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 713.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K5000 SYNC and Radeon RX Vega M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K5000 SYNC is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega M is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
Quadro K5000 SYNC
AMD Radeon RX Vega M
Radeon RX Vega M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 25 votes

Rate Quadro K5000 SYNC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K5000 SYNC or Radeon RX Vega M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.