Radeon RX 6300 XT vs Quadro K4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking461not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.92no data
Power efficiency7.29no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGK104Navi 24
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 July 2014 (11 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$854.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores13441024
Core clock speed771 MHzno data
Boost clock speed784 MHz2500 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)108 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate87.81160.0
Floating-point processing power2.107 TFLOPS5.12 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs11264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1350 MHz16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth172.8 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan+1.2
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 108 Watt 100 Watt

RX 6300 XT has a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K4200 and Radeon RX 6300 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K4200 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6300 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Quadro K4200
AMD Radeon RX 6300 XT
Radeon RX 6300 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 183 votes

Rate Quadro K4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 19 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6300 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K4200 or Radeon RX 6300 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.