Radeon HD 7950 Boost vs Quadro K4200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking418not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.17no data
Power efficiency7.25no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameGK104Tahiti
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 July 2014 (10 years ago)22 June 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$854.99 $449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores13441792
Core clock speed771 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed784 MHz925 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)108 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate87.81103.6
Floating-point processing power2.107 TFLOPS3.315 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs112112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm274 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB3 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1350 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth172.8 GB/s240.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 July 2014 22 June 2012
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 3 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 108 Watt 200 Watt

Quadro K4200 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 85.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K4200 and Radeon HD 7950 Boost. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K4200 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 7950 Boost is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Quadro K4200
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost
Radeon HD 7950 Boost

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 156 votes

Rate Quadro K4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 13 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7950 Boost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.