Quadro K4200 vs 7000

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Quadro 7000
2012
6 GB GDDR5
9.05

K4200 outperforms 7000 by 23% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking445386
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.914.34
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGF110GK104
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date2 May 2012 (11 years old)22 July 2014 (9 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$14,499 $854.99
Current price$965 (0.1x MSRP)$311 (0.4x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro K4200 has 377% better value for money than Quadro 7000.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121344
Core clock speed651 MHz771 MHz
Boost clock speedno data784 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)204 Watt108 Watt
Texture fill rate41.6687.81
Floating-point performance1,332 gflops2,107 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length248 mm241 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed3404 MHz5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth163.4 GB/s172.8 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A+
CUDA2.03.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 7000 9.05
Quadro K4200 11.17
+23.4%

K4200 outperforms 7000 by 23% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro 7000 3505
Quadro K4200 4326
+23.4%

K4200 outperforms 7000 by 23% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 9.05 11.17
Recency 2 May 2012 22 July 2014
Cost $14499 $854.99
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 204 Watt 108 Watt

The Quadro K4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 7000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 7000
Quadro 7000
NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Quadro K4200

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 5 votes

Rate Quadro 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 139 votes

Rate Quadro K4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.