GeForce FX 5800 Ultra vs Quadro K4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking475not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.94no data
Power efficiency7.36no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameGK104NV30
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 July 2014 (11 years ago)6 March 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$854.99 $399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1344no data
Core clock speed771 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed784 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million125 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)108 Wattno data
Texture fill rate87.814.000
Floating-point processing power2.107 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs1128
L1 Cache112 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Length241 mm213 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1350 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth172.8 GB/s16 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0a
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 July 2014 6 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm

Quadro K4200 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K4200 and GeForce FX 5800 Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K4200 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce FX 5800 Ultra is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Quadro K4200
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5800 Ultra
GeForce FX 5800 Ultra

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 188 votes

Rate Quadro K4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 18 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5800 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K4200 or GeForce FX 5800 Ultra, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.