ATI All-In-Wonder HD 3650 vs Quadro K420

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking982not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.08no data
Power efficiency3.25no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGK107RV635
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 July 2014 (11 years ago)28 June 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$96.67 $199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192120
Core clock speed876 MHz722 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million378 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)41 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate14.025.776
Floating-point processing power0.3364 TFLOPS0.1733 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs168
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length160 mm232 mm
Width1" (2.5 cm)1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type128 BitDDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB/2 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz594 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 29 GB/s19.01 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1210.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 July 2014 28 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB/2 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 41 Watt 55 Watt

Quadro K420 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 96% more advanced lithography process, and 34% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K420 and All-In-Wonder HD 3650. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K420 is a workstation graphics card while All-In-Wonder HD 3650 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 164 votes

Rate Quadro K420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder HD 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K420 or All-In-Wonder HD 3650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.