Quadro FX 330 vs Quadro K4100M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking547not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.50no data
Power efficiency4.91no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameGK104NV37
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date23 July 2013 (11 years ago)28 June 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152no data
Core clock speed706 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt21 Watt
Texture fill rate67.781.000
Floating-point processing power1.627 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs964

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/s3.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX129.0a
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.51.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 July 2013 28 June 2004
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 21 Watt

K4100M has an age advantage of 9 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

FX 330, on the other hand, has 376.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K4100M and Quadro FX 330. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K4100M is a mobile workstation card while Quadro FX 330 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
Quadro K4100M
NVIDIA Quadro FX 330
Quadro FX 330

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 91 vote

Rate Quadro K4100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.