ATI Graphics Wonder PCI vs Quadro K4100M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking540not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.47no data
Power efficiency4.94no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Mach (1992−1997)
GPU code nameGK104Mach32
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date23 July 2013 (11 years ago)1992 (32 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 $199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152no data
Core clock speed706 MHz10 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm700 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate67.78no data
Floating-point processing power1.627 TFLOPSno data
ROPs321
TMUs96no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCI
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DRAM
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz10 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/s80 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12N/A
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.5N/A
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 700 nm

K4100M has a 409500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K4100M and Graphics Wonder PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K4100M is a mobile workstation card while Graphics Wonder PCI is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
Quadro K4100M
ATI Graphics Wonder PCI
Graphics Wonder PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 77 votes

Rate Quadro K4100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Graphics Wonder PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.