Radeon RX 5950 vs Quadro K4000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking681not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.78no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGK104Navi 21
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 June 2012 (13 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9604864
Core clock speed601 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1535 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million21,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt350 Watt
Texture fill rate48.08466.6
Floating-point processing power1.154 TFLOPS14.93 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs80304
L1 Cache80 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth89.6 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+-
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 350 Watt

K4000M has 250% lower power consumption.

RX 5950, on the other hand, has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K4000M and Radeon RX 5950. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K4000M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 5950 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
Quadro K4000M
AMD Radeon RX 5950
Radeon RX 5950

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 14 votes

Rate Quadro K4000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 11 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K4000M or Radeon RX 5950, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.