Radeon Pro V7350X2 vs Quadro K4000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking676not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.76no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGK104Ellesmere
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date1 June 2012 (13 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9602304
Core clock speed601 MHz1188 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1243 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate48.08179.0
Floating-point processing power1.154 TFLOPSno data
ROPs3232
TMUs80144
L1 Cache80 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz7 GB/s
Memory bandwidth89.6 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 200 Watt

K4000M has 100% lower power consumption.

Pro V7350X2, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K4000M and Radeon Pro V7350X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K4000M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon Pro V7350X2 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
Quadro K4000M
AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2
Radeon Pro V7350X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 14 votes

Rate Quadro K4000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro V7350X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K4000M or Radeon Pro V7350X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.