Quadro K4000M vs P5000

Place in performance ranking	160	588
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	9.93	1.08
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	GP104	N14E-Q3
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 October 2016 (7 years old)	1 June 2012 (11 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,499	no data
Current price	$1270 (0.5x MSRP)	$240

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P5000 has 819% better value for money than K4000M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	960
Core clock speed	1607 MHz	600 MHz
Boost clock speed	1733 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	7,200 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	277.3	48.08
Floating-point performance	8,873 gflops	1,154 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro P5000 and Quadro K4000M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	9016 MHz	2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s	89.6 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort	No outputs
Display Port	1.4	no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	+
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	+
CUDA	6.1	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P5000 31.90
+530%

K4000M 5.06

P5000 outperforms K4000M by 530% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P5000 12357
+530%

K4000M 1960

P5000 outperforms K4000M by 530% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Quadro P5000 49608
+831%

K4000M 5326

P5000 outperforms K4000M by 831% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Benchmark coverage: 4%

Quadro P5000 45153
+871%

K4000M 4650

P5000 outperforms K4000M by 871% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	95 +102%	47 −102%
4K	41 +583%	6−7 −583%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

50−55
+575%

8−9

−575%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 +567%	9−10 −567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +1020%	5−6 −1020%
Battlefield 5	95−100 +553%	14−16 −553%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	85−90 +438%	16−18 −438%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +575%	8−9 −575%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +655%	10−12 −655%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 +627%	10−12 −627%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +538%	16−18 −538%
Hitman 3	95−100 +800%	10−12 −800%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +667%	9−10 −667%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +467%	9−10 −467%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 +469%	12−14 −469%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +757%	7−8 −757%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 +567%	9−10 −567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +1020%	5−6 −1020%
Battlefield 5	95−100 +553%	14−16 −553%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	85−90 +438%	16−18 −438%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +575%	8−9 −575%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +655%	10−12 −655%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 +627%	10−12 −627%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +538%	16−18 −538%
Hitman 3	95−100 +800%	10−12 −800%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +667%	9−10 −667%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +686%	7−8 −686%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +467%	9−10 −467%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 +469%	12−14 −469%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	98 +791%	10−12 −791%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +757%	7−8 −757%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 +567%	9−10 −567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +1020%	5−6 −1020%
Battlefield 5	95−100 +553%	14−16 −553%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +575%	8−9 −575%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +655%	10−12 −655%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 +627%	10−12 −627%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +538%	16−18 −538%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	53 +382%	10−12 −382%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +757%	7−8 −757%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +538%	8−9 −538%
Hitman 3	55−60 +522%	9−10 −522%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +291%	10−12 −291%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +1033%	3−4 −1033%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +733%	3−4 −733%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +463%	8−9 −463%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +1067%	3−4 −1067%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +580%	5−6 −580%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +6800%	1−2 −6800%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +1050%	2−3 −1050%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +613%	8−9 −613%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 +1425%	4−5 −1425%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +857%	7−8 −857%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +740%	5−6 −740%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30	0−1

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +575%	4−5 −575%
Hitman 3	30−35 +520%	5−6 −520%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +175%	8−9 −175%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +600%	3−4 −600%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +467%	3−4 −467%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +2300%	1−2 −2300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	36 +3500%	1−2 −3500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +600%	3−4 −600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +850%	2−3 −850%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +550%	6−7 −550%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10	0−1
Far Cry 5	27−30 +480%	5−6 −480%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +357%	7−8 −357%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +1400%	3−4 −1400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18	0−1