Riva 128 vs Quadro K2200M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking539not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.98no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)no data
GPU code nameGM107NV3
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date19 July 2014 (11 years ago)1 April 1997 (28 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed667 MHz100 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million4 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt4 Watt
Texture fill rate26.680.1
Floating-point processing power0.8538 TFLOPSno data
ROPs161
TMUs401
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)AGP 2x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz100 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s1.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA, 1x DB13W3
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX125.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.51.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 July 2014 1 April 1997
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 350 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 4 Watt

K2200M has an age advantage of 17 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

Riva 128, on the other hand, has 1525% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K2200M and Riva 128. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K2200M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Riva 128 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
Quadro K2200M
NVIDIA Riva 128
Riva 128

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 39 votes

Rate Quadro K2200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 62 votes

Rate Riva 128 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K2200M or Riva 128, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.