Quadro K2200M vs P3000 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	270	449
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	9.88	3.74
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code name	N17E-Q1	GM107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	11 January 2017 (7 years old)	19 July 2014 (9 years old)
Current price	$537	$228

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

P3000 Mobile has 164% better value for money than K2200M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	640
Core clock speed	1088 MHz	667 MHz
Boost clock speed	1215 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	7,200 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	65 Watt
Texture fill rate	97.20	26.68
Floating-point performance	3,110 gflops	853.8 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro P3000 Mobile and Quadro K2200M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	168 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.4	1.2

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
3D Vision Pro	no data	+
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	+
nView Display Management	+	+
Optimus	+	+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	+
CUDA	6.1	5.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	64 +137%	27−30 −137%
4K	28 +133%	12−14 −133%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−33
+150%

12−14

−150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +117%	18−20 −117%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +136%	14−16 −136%
Battlefield 5	60−65 +137%	27−30 −137%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +138%	21−24 −138%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +150%	12−14 −150%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +138%	21−24 −138%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +117%	24−27 −117%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +120%	30−33 −120%
Hitman 3	55−60 +129%	24−27 −129%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +128%	18−20 −128%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +129%	14−16 −129%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +128%	18−20 −128%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +131%	16−18 −131%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +117%	18−20 −117%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +136%	14−16 −136%
Battlefield 5	60−65 +137%	27−30 −137%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +138%	21−24 −138%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +150%	12−14 −150%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +138%	21−24 −138%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +117%	24−27 −117%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +120%	30−33 −120%
Hitman 3	55−60 +129%	24−27 −129%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +128%	18−20 −128%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +121%	14−16 −121%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +129%	14−16 −129%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +128%	18−20 −128%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	63 +133%	27−30 −133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +131%	16−18 −131%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +117%	18−20 −117%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +136%	14−16 −136%
Battlefield 5	60−65 +137%	27−30 −137%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +150%	12−14 −150%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +138%	21−24 −138%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +117%	24−27 −117%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +120%	30−33 −120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	33 +136%	14−16 −136%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +131%	16−18 −131%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +142%	12−14 −142%
Hitman 3	30−35 +121%	14−16 −121%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +117%	12−14 −117%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +125%	8−9 −125%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +150%	10−11 −150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 +122%	9−10 −122%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +125%	8−9 −125%
Battlefield 5	40−45 +133%	18−20 −133%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +120%	5−6 −120%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +129%	14−16 −129%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +131%	16−18 −131%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +117%	18−20 −117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +133%	9−10 −133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 +117%	6−7 −117%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Hitman 3	18−20 +125%	8−9 −125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Metro Exodus	10−12 +120%	5−6 −120%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +117%	6−7 −117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	22 +120%	10−11 −120%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Battlefield 5	21−24 +120%	10−11 −120%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +150%	6−7 −150%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +125%	8−9 −125%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +125%	12−14 −125%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%

This is how P3000 Mobile and K2200M compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

P3000 Mobile is 137% faster than K2200M

4K resolution:

P3000 Mobile is 133% faster than K2200M

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	19.19	8.95
Recency	11 January 2017	19 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	65 Watt