Radeon Pro 570X vs Quadro K2100M

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	684	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	0.57	no data
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	GK106	Polaris 20
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	23 July 2013 (10 years ago)	18 March 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$84.95	no data
Current price	$208 (2.4x MSRP)	$2299

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	576	1792
Core clock speed	667 MHz	1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1105 MHz
Number of transistors	2,540 million	5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	120 Watt
Texture fill rate	32.02	123.8
Floating-point performance	768.4 gflops	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro K2100M and Radeon Pro 570X compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	3000 MHz	6800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	48.0 GB/s	217.6 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2	no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5	6.4
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Advantages and disadvantages

---

Recency	23 July 2013	18 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	120 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---