NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs AMD FirePro M4100
Comparison of Quadro K2000M and FirePro M4100 architecture, market type and release date.
Quadro K2000M and FirePro M4100's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro K2000M and FirePro M4100's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
23.84 GTexel / s
16.08 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro K2000M and FirePro M4100 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCIe 3.0 x8
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro K2000M and FirePro M4100: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
28.8 GB / s
64 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro K2000M and FirePro M4100.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro K2000M and FirePro M4100. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
APIs supported by Quadro K2000M and FirePro M4100, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
DirectX 12 (FL 11_1), Shader 5.0
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro K2000M and FirePro M4100. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
K2000M 1.08 +6.9%
FirePro M4100 1.01
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
K2000M 8766 +39.2%
FirePro M4100 6297
3DMark Fire Strike Score
K2000M 1040 +27.6%
FirePro M4100 815
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
K2000M 1046 +22.1%
FirePro M4100 857
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
K2000M 1798 +4.1%
FirePro M4100 1728
Unigine Heaven 3.0
K2000M 17 +54.5%
FirePro M4100 11
K2000M 1081 +2.1%
FirePro M4100 1059
Rendering quality tests
GFXBench render quality
GFXBench high precision render quality
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro K2000M and FirePro M4100. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
18 Mh/s −311.1%
74 Mh/s +311.1%
Let's see how good Quadro K2000M and FirePro M4100 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
6.9% faster in synthetic tests
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture - an API for video card computing power usage in tasks different from 3D graphics processing. Can be used for physics simulation for instance)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
Advantages of AMD FirePro M4100
Much newer (1 October 2013 vs 1 June 2012)
Higher memory bandwidth (64 vs 28.8 GB/s)
AMD App Acceleration
AMD PowerPlay power management technology
AMD PowerTune technology
AMD ZeroCore Power technology
AMD Enduro technology
So, Quadro K2000M or FirePro M4100?
Technical City couldn't decide between NVIDIA Quadro K2000M and AMD FirePro M4100. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro K2000M and FirePro M4100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.