A100 SXM4 80 GB vs Quadro GV100

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking52not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.65no data
Power efficiency14.10no data
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGV100GA100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date27 March 2018 (6 years ago)16 November 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$8,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51206912
Core clock speed1132 MHz1095 MHz
Boost clock speed1627 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate520.6609.1
Floating-point processing power16.66 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs128160
TMUs320432
Tensor Cores640432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount32 GB80 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz1593 MHz
Memory bandwidth868.4 GB/s2,039 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.08.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 March 2018 16 November 2020
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 80 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 400 Watt

Quadro GV100 has 60% lower power consumption.

A100 SXM4 80 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro GV100 and A100 SXM4 80 GB. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Quadro GV100
NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB
A100 SXM4 80 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 53 votes

Rate Quadro GV100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 58 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 80 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.