UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) vs Quadro FX Go700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated948
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data13.86
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameNV31Gen. 11
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date25 June 2003 (22 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data32
Core clock speed295 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data900 MHz
Number of transistors80 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology130 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data4.8 - 10 Watt
Texture fill rate1.180no data
ROPs4no data
TMUs4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRno data
Maximum RAM amount128 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed295 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth9.44 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12_1
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 June 2003 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 130 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) has an age advantage of 17 years, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX Go700 and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX Go700 is a mobile workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX Go700
Quadro FX Go700
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX Go700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 19 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX Go700 or UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.