UHD Graphics vs Quadro FX 770M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro FX 770M with UHD Graphics, including specs and performance data.
Graphics outperforms 770M by a whopping 922% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1296 | 677 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 3 |
| Power efficiency | 1.12 | 39.58 |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) |
| GPU code name | G96 | Jasper Lake GT1 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 14 August 2008 (17 years ago) | 11 January 2021 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $527 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 32 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 750 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 314 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 10 nm+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 8.000 | 12.00 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.08 TFLOPS | 0.384 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 16 | 16 |
| L2 Cache | 32 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | MXM-II | Ring Bus |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
| CUDA | 1.1 | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−900%
|
10−11
+900%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−900%
|
10−11
+900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−900%
|
40−45
+900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−900%
|
80−85
+900%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−900%
|
270−280
+900%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 16−18
−900%
|
170−180
+900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−900%
|
10−11
+900%
|
| Dota 2 | 10−12
−900%
|
110−120
+900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−900%
|
40−45
+900%
|
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−900%
|
80−85
+900%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−900%
|
50−55
+900%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−900%
|
270−280
+900%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−900%
|
10−11
+900%
|
| Dota 2 | 10−12
−900%
|
110−120
+900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−900%
|
40−45
+900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−900%
|
80−85
+900%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−900%
|
50−55
+900%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−900%
|
270−280
+900%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−900%
|
30−33
+900%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 2−3
−800%
|
18−20
+800%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 5−6
−900%
|
50−55
+900%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−800%
|
18−20
+800%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−900%
|
10−11
+900%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−900%
|
140−150
+900%
|
| Valorant | 3−4
−900%
|
30−33
+900%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−800%
|
18−20
+800%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
−800%
|
18−20
+800%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.51 | 5.21 |
| Recency | 14 August 2008 | 11 January 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 10 Watt |
UHD Graphics has a 922% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 550% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.
The UHD Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 770M in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro FX 770M is a mobile workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
