ATI All-In-Wonder HD 3650 vs Quadro FX 770M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1292not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.12no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameG96RV635
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date14 August 2008 (17 years ago)28 June 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$527 $199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32120
Core clock speed500 MHz722 MHz
Number of transistors314 million378 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate8.0005.776
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS0.1733 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs168
L2 Cache32 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data232 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz594 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s19.01 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 August 2008 28 June 2008
Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 55 Watt

FX 770M has an age advantage of 1 month, and 57.1% lower power consumption.

ATI All-In-Wonder HD 3650, on the other hand, has a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 770M and All-In-Wonder HD 3650. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 770M is a mobile workstation graphics card while All-In-Wonder HD 3650 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
Quadro FX 770M
ATI All-In-Wonder HD 3650
All-In-Wonder HD 3650

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 31 votes

Rate Quadro FX 770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder HD 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 770M or All-In-Wonder HD 3650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.