GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM vs Quadro FX 580

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1249not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.72no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameG96CGK106
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date9 April 2009 (15 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32960
Core clock speed450 MHz1033 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1098 MHz
Number of transistors314 million2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate7.20087.84
Floating-point processing power0.072 TFLOPSno data
ROPs824
TMUs1680

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length198 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s192.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.06.5 (5.1)
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2.175
CUDA1.13.0

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 150 Watt

FX 580 has 275% lower power consumption.

GTX 750 Ti OEM, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 580 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 580 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 580
Quadro FX 580
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 95 votes

Rate Quadro FX 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 109 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.