ATI Radeon X300 vs Quadro FX 5600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1074not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.56no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameG80RV370
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date5 March 2007 (18 years ago)1 September 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed600 MHz375 MHz
Number of transistors681 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)171 Watt36 Watt
Texture fill rate38.401.500
Floating-point processing power0.3456 TFLOPSno data
ROPs244
TMUs324
L2 Cache96 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length254 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB64 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 March 2007 1 September 2004
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 171 Watt 36 Watt

FX 5600 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 22.2% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X300, on the other hand, has 375% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 5600 and Radeon X300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 5600 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X300 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600
Quadro FX 5600
ATI Radeon X300
Radeon X300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 7 votes

Rate Quadro FX 5600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 41 votes

Rate Radeon X300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 5600 or Radeon X300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.