ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5730 vs Quadro FX 5600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
FX 4600 FX 4600 SDI FX 5600 FX 5600 Mac Edition Plex 1000 Model IV Plex 2100 S4 Tesla C870 Tesla D870 Tesla S870
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5145 5165 5430 5450 5470 5570 5650 5670 Mac Edition 5730 5750 5770 5830 5850 5850 Mac Edition 5870 5870 Crossfire

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 5600 with Mobility Radeon HD 5730, including specs and performance data.

FX 5600
2007, $2,999
1536 MB GDDR3, 171 Watt
1.24

Mobility HD 5730 outperforms FX 5600 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FX 5600 FX 5600
ATI Mobility HD 5730 Mobility HD 5730

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10901070
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.563.88
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameG80Madison
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date5 March 2007 (18 years ago)7 January 2010 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128400
Core clock speed600 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors681 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)171 Watt26 Watt
Texture fill rate38.4013.00
Floating-point processing power0.3456 TFLOPS0.52 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs3220
L1 Cacheno data40 KB
L2 Cache96 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length254 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB1 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p12−14
−16.7%
14
+16.7%
Full HD16−18
−12.5%
18
+12.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p187.44no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how FX 5600 and ATI Mobility HD 5730 compete in popular games:

  • ATI Mobility HD 5730 is 17% faster in 900p
  • ATI Mobility HD 5730 is 13% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 48 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.24 1.31
Recency 5 March 2007 7 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 171 Watt 26 Watt

FX 5600 has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

ATI Mobility HD 5730, on the other hand, has a 5.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 125% more advanced lithography process, and 557.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro FX 5600 and Mobility Radeon HD 5730.

Be aware that Quadro FX 5600 is a workstation graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 5730 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600
Quadro FX 5600
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5730
Mobility Radeon HD 5730
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FX 5600 Quadro FX 5600
vs
GRID K160Q GRID K160Q
ATI Mobility HD 5730 Mobility Radeon HD 5730
vs
GT 550M GeForce GT 550M
FX 5600 Quadro FX 5600
vs
FirePro V3900 FirePro V3900
FX 370 NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
vs
Tesla V100 SMX2 Tesla V100 SMX2
FX 570 NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
vs
ATI FireGL V3350 FireGL V3350
FX 4600 NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
vs
RTX 3070 Ti GA102 RTX 3070 Ti GA102
FX 4600 NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
vs
RTX 4070 SUPER RTX 4070 SUPER
FX 4600 SDI NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI
vs
GeForce MX550 GeForce MX550
FX 5600 Mac Edition NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
vs
NVS 280 PCIe NVS 280 PCIe
FX 550 NVIDIA Quadro FX 550
vs
ATI V7800P FirePro V7800P
FX 560 NVIDIA Quadro FX 560
vs
4000 Mac Edition Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
FX 1300 NVIDIA Quadro FX 1300
vs
RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q
FX 1400 NVIDIA Quadro FX 1400
vs
CMP 100HX-210 CMP 100HX-210

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 7 votes

Rate Quadro FX 5600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 16 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 5600 or Mobility Radeon HD 5730, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.