ATI Radeon HD 3850 X3 vs Quadro FX 560

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1406not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.69no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameG73RV670
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date20 April 2006 (19 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data320
Core clock speed350 MHz669 MHz
Number of transistors177 million666 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt145 Watt
Texture fill rate4.20010.70
ROPs816
TMUs1216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length198 mm292 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1700 MBps
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/s54.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video4x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model3.04.1
OpenGL2.13.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 145 Watt

FX 560 has 383.3% lower power consumption.

ATI HD 3850 X3, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 63.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 560 and Radeon HD 3850 X3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 560 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 3850 X3 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 560
Quadro FX 560
ATI Radeon HD 3850 X3
Radeon HD 3850 X3

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 5 votes

Rate Quadro FX 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 3850 X3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 560 or Radeon HD 3850 X3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.