GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition vs Quadro FX 560

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1406not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.69no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG73G96C
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date20 April 2006 (19 years ago)25 October 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data32
Core clock speed350 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors177 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate4.2008.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.08 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs1216
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16MXM-II
Length198 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz792 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/s25.34 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 April 2006 25 October 2008
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 23 Watt

9600M GT Mac Edition has an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 63.6% more advanced lithography process, and 30.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 560 and GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 560 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 560
Quadro FX 560
NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition
GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 5 votes

Rate Quadro FX 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 560 or GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.