ATI FirePro 2460 Multi-View vs Quadro FX 560

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1414not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.69no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameG73Cedar
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date20 April 2006 (19 years ago)1 April 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data80
Core clock speed350 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors177 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt17 Watt
Texture fill rate4.2004.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.08 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length198 mm170 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/s32 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video4x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model3.05.0
OpenGL2.14.4
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 April 2006 1 April 2010
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 17 Watt

ATI 2460 Multi-View has an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 125% more advanced lithography process, and 76.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 560 and FirePro 2460 Multi-View. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 560
Quadro FX 560
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi-View
FirePro 2460 Multi-View

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 5 votes

Rate Quadro FX 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate FirePro 2460 Multi-View on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 560 or FirePro 2460 Multi-View, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.