ATI FireGL V8600 vs Quadro FX 560

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1411not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.69no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameG73R600
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date20 April 2006 (19 years ago)14 May 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 $1,899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data320
Core clock speed350 MHz688 MHz
Number of transistors177 million720 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt159 Watt
Texture fill rate4.20011.01
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4403 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs1216
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length198 mm254 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR4
Maximum RAM amount128 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz868 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/s111.1 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 April 2006 14 May 2007
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 159 Watt

FX 560 has 430% lower power consumption.

ATI FireGL V8600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 12.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 560 and FireGL V8600. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 560
Quadro FX 560
ATI FireGL V8600
FireGL V8600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 5 votes

Rate Quadro FX 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V8600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 560 or FireGL V8600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.