Radeon R9 280X2 vs Quadro FX 550M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameG73Tahiti
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date13 March 2006 (19 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048 ×2
Core clock speed480 MHz950 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors177 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt375 Watt
Texture fill rate5.760128.0 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data4.096 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs832 ×2
TMUs12128 ×2
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data315 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data3x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB3 GB ×2
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed500 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s288.0 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_1)
Shader Model3.06.5 (5.1)
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.1 (1.2)
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 3 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 375 Watt

FX 550M has 971.4% lower power consumption.

R9 280X2, on the other hand, has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 550M and Radeon R9 280X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 550M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon R9 280X2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 550M
Quadro FX 550M
AMD Radeon R9 280X2
Radeon R9 280X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Quadro FX 550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon R9 280X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 550M or Radeon R9 280X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.