GeForce GT 230 OEM vs Quadro FX 5500

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1190not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.45no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG71G92B
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date20 April 2006 (18 years ago)27 April 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data96
Core clock speed650 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors278 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)96 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate15.6024.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.24 TFLOPS
ROPs1612
TMUs2448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1536 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed505 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth32.32 GB/s24 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 April 2006 27 April 2009
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 96 Watt 75 Watt

GT 230 OEM has an age advantage of 3 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 63.6% more advanced lithography process, and 28% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 5500 and GeForce GT 230 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 5500 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GT 230 OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 5500
Quadro FX 5500
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM
GeForce GT 230 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Quadro FX 5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate GeForce GT 230 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.