GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2 vs Quadro FX 5500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1262not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.46no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG71G96B
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date20 April 2006 (19 years ago)29 July 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data32
Core clock speed650 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors278 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)96 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate15.609.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.096 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs2416
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length229 mm175 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed505 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth32.32 GB/s28.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 April 2006 29 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 96 Watt 50 Watt

FX 5500 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

9500 GT Rev. 2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 92% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 5500 and GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 5500 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 5500
Quadro FX 5500
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2
GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Quadro FX 5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 7 votes

Rate GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 5500 or GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.