Radeon Sky 900 vs Quadro FX 550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1488not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.38no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameNV43Tahiti
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date20 April 2006 (19 years ago)27 March 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3584 ×2
Core clock speed360 MHz825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data950 MHz
Number of transistors146 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate2.880106.4 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data3.405 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs432 ×2
TMUs8112 ×2
L1 Cacheno data448 KB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length198 mm305 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB6 GB ×2
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed400 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s480 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
Dual-link DVI support-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_1)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)4.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 April 2006 27 March 2013
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 300 Watt

FX 550 has 900% lower power consumption.

Sky 900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 550 and Radeon Sky 900. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 550
Quadro FX 550
AMD Radeon Sky 900
Radeon Sky 900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 8 votes

Rate Quadro FX 550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Sky 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 550 or Radeon Sky 900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.