Radeon R9 370 1024SP vs Quadro FX 550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1490not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.38no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameNV43Trinidad
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date20 April 2006 (19 years ago)12 June 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed360 MHz925 MHz
Boost clock speedno data975 MHz
Number of transistors146 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate2.88062.40
Floating-point processing powerno data1.997 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length198 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s179.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_1)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)4.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 April 2006 12 June 2015
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 150 Watt

FX 550 has 400% lower power consumption.

R9 370 1024SP, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 550 and Radeon R9 370 1024SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 550 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R9 370 1024SP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 550
Quadro FX 550
AMD Radeon R9 370 1024SP
Radeon R9 370 1024SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 8 votes

Rate Quadro FX 550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.1 301 votes

Rate Radeon R9 370 1024SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 550 or Radeon R9 370 1024SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.