ATI Radeon X1650 XT vs Quadro FX 540
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1444 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 0.58 | no data |
| Architecture | Curie (2003−2013) | R500 (2005−2007) |
| GPU code name | NV43 | RV560 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 9 August 2004 (21 years ago) | 30 October 2006 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | $199 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 525 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 146 million | 330 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 110 nm | 80 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 2.400 | 4.200 |
| ROPs | 4 | 8 |
| TMUs | 8 | 8 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 198 mm | no data |
| Width | 1-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 250 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 8 GB/s | 22.4 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) | 9.0c (9_3) |
| Shader Model | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial) | 2.0 |
| OpenCL | N/A | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 9 August 2004 | 30 October 2006 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Chip lithography | 110 nm | 80 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 55 Watt |
FX 540 has 120% lower power consumption.
ATI X1650 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 540 and Radeon X1650 XT. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro FX 540 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X1650 XT is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
