Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs Quadro FX 540

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1385not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.59no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNV43DG2-128
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date9 August 2004 (20 years ago)24 August 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed300 MHz1600 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1950 MHz
Number of transistors146 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate2.400124.8
Floating-point processing powerno data3.994 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length198 mm170 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s186.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 August 2004 24 August 2022
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 75 Watt

FX 540 has 200% lower power consumption.

Data Center GPU Flex 140, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 18 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1733.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 540 and Data Center GPU Flex 140. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 540
Quadro FX 540
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
Data Center GPU Flex 140

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 14 votes

Rate Quadro FX 540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate Data Center GPU Flex 140 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.