Apple M4 Max 32-Core GPU vs Quadro FX 540

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1464not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.58no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)no data
GPU code nameNV43no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date9 August 2004 (21 years ago)30 October 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data32
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Number of transistors146 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology110 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate2.400no data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Length198 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRLPDDR5x-8533
Maximum RAM amount128 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed250 MHz8533 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Videono data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)no data
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 August 2004 30 October 2024
Chip lithography 110 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 45 Watt

FX 540 has 80% lower power consumption.

Apple M4 Max 32-Core GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 20 years, and a 3566.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 540 and M4 Max 32-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 540 is a workstation graphics card while Apple M4 Max 32-Core GPU is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 540
Quadro FX 540
Apple M4 Max 32-Core GPU
M4 Max 32-Core GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 14 votes

Rate Quadro FX 540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 38 votes

Rate M4 Max 32-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 540 or M4 Max 32-Core GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.