FX 4800 vs K2200M

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

K2200M
8.95
+250%

K2200M outperforms FX 4800 by 250% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking448784
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money3.700.09
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGM107GT200B
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date19 July 2014 (9 years old)11 November 2008 (15 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,799
Current price$228 $632 (0.4x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

K2200M has 4011% better value for money than FX 4800.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640192
Core clock speed667 MHz602 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate26.6838.53
Floating-point performance853.8 gflops462.3 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthMXM Module2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1536 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed5012 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s76.8 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
Display Port1.2no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1211.1 (10_0)
Shader Model54.0
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA5.01.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K2200M 8.95
+250%
FX 4800 2.56

K2200M outperforms FX 4800 by 250% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

K2200M 3468
+250%
FX 4800 991

K2200M outperforms FX 4800 by 250% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 8.95 2.56
Recency 19 July 2014 11 November 2008
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 150 Watt

The Quadro K2200M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 4800 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
Quadro K2200M
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
Quadro FX 4800

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 20 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro K2200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 58 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.